Skip to content
Lusha vs DataBees: The Best Lusha Alternative for GTM Teams in 2025
Looking for a Lusha alternative that goes beyond basic data access? Meet DataBees — a done-for-you data provider built for hard-to-find prospect data, flexible workflows, and scalable operations. This detailed comparison between Lusha vs DataBees explores data quality, pricing, flexibility, and ICP accuracy, helping sales and marketing teams make the best choice in 2025.
Data Quality
Lusha
Lusha licenses information from business partners who own established and trustworthy directories. Their partners utilize AI and machine learning technology to collect data from public records, publicly available information, and business directories.
DataBees
DataBees prioritizes data accuracy through our tech + human verification process. Every data point we source is validated by real researchers and our QA team, who check data sets before delivery. This results in high-quality contact data that are ideal for mission-critical GTM motions.
While DataBees may take more time due to the manual process, the payoff is reliable and enriched data — especially valuable when you need accurate b2b contact info, deep intent data, or hard-to-find roles. It’s perfect for targeted email campaigns and nuanced lead-generation workflows.
Ideal Customer Profile Data
Lusha
Lusha offers convenient ICP filtering via its self-service platform. For example, you can filter by job title, location, and industry, but more nuanced filters — highly specific to your niche — will be unavailable.
DataBees
DataBees excels in building ICP-specific lists based on your specific criteria. Our process sources each contact and company data point using our backend waterfall tech, then adds a further layer of depth via additional online sources, including LinkedIn, company websites, regulatory or government databases, public or private communities, or industry publications and reports. This makes DataBees an exceptional alternative to Lusha when nuanced Ideal Customer data matters.
Pricing
Lusha
Lusha’s pricing plans start at $79/month with fixed email credits and scale for teams. The freemium model makes it easy to try, and pricing is transparent. Lusha works well for SMBs, thanks to its Chrome extension, credit model, and sales intelligence tool interface.
However, while the cost per contact may be lower, you're also paying for b2b data that everyone else has access to — which can lack the depth of data enrichment offered by services like DataBees.
DataBees
DataBees is your full-stack Sales Data Operations team offered on a simple subscription-based model (starting at ~$1440/month per researcher). We don't charge based on credits; our output depends on the complexity of your required data points and volume you require. To test our service, book a free, zero-obligation sample and tell us about your business needs.
Flexibility
Lusha
Lusha is easy to adopt and integrates with platforms like HubSpot and Salesforce. Its strength is speed and plug-and-play usability. However, if you’re looking for a lusha alternative that provides flexibility across multiple data types, Lusha is limited to what's in its platform.
DataBees
DataBees is highly adaptable for custom tasks like lead research. Want to find contact roles across niche verticals or enrich an internal database? DataBees adjusts to your workflow, output format (CSV, Excel, CRM), and pace. It's a seamless integration into your workflow.
Using DataBees with Lusha
Some teams use Lusha to kick off prospecting — grabbing quick contacts through the Chrome extension, then layering in DataBees to fill gaps or double-check high-priority leads. Lusha may miss niche contact and company data or provide outdated info, which DataBees can enrich and verify.
By using both tools, your sales reps can start broad and then narrow with accurate B2B contact data. This complimentary setup boosts sales engagement and shortens the sales cycle by ensuring your outreach is both fast and deeply targeted.